Quote of the Weak - Wisdom

"Getting older does not mean you are wise, it just means you are old."

- Günther Schulze, SCFS Board Member

"A wise man will hear, and will increase learning; and a man of understanding shall attain wise counsels."
(Proverbs 1:5)

Old Man in Armchair, Unknown (17th century) Art.com

Black Friday

A lot has changed in America since 1932. During the great depression many people were reduced to the humiliation of standing in bread lines for their daily sustenance.

Today I think it can truly be said, "We are rich and have need of nothing, except maybe a Playstation 3!"

What is the cause of our extreme prosperity?

Surely our Puritan work ethic and "Christian" ideals, and some would say our support for the modern state of Israel, have been the cause of much of our nations prosperity. But, a far more sinister promotion to our wealth lurks under the thin skin of our Christian facade -- GREED.

The scenes we witnessed on Friday were despicable in the worst way. Wealthy (in comparison to most of the world's population) people fought over toys and "good deals." We actually saw "animal" behavior over entertainment. We are not far from the Coliseum of Rome.

Many of our Fundamentalist brothers are fond of pointing out that America is becoming Sodom and Gamorrah. The popular teaching is that Sodom and Gamorrah were destroyed for their immorality (particularly homosexuality). I think they are correct in part, but not because of homosexuality (that is simply a symptom and a sign of God's judgment). The cities of Sodom and Gamorrah were known for their PRIDE and GREED as well as their immoral behavior.

"As I live, says the Lord GOD, your sister Sodom and her daughters have not done as you and your daughters have done. Behold, this was the guilt of your sister Sodom: she and her daughters had pride, surfeit of food, and prosperous ease, but did not aid the poor and needy. They were haughty, and did abominable things before me; therefore I removed them, when I saw it." (Ezek. 16:48-50)

Many children (and adults for that matter) will be exposed to greater depths of spiritual poverty this Christmas as they play "Gangsta" video games on their new Playstations, log on to pornographic websites on their new computers and begin making their wish lists for next year.

What is the answer? Should we move to a cave? Should we hide our heads in the sand? Maybe we should have more activities at church to compete with the world? Maybe we should protest? NO!

Christ's Kingdom is not of this world, yet we are called to live in the world and not be of it. Our uniqueness is not that our women wear burkas, or that we all dress alike, or wear name plates with "Elder So and So" on it, or what we do not do. Our uniqueness is the Spirit that dwells within us by faith and is manifest outwardly in love, godliness and good character. It is what we DO (obedience to love) that displays God in us.

In a prosperous nation we are commanded to hear the Savior knocking and open the door. He will fellowship with us. We can overcome as our hearts desire Christ more than the things of this world. In the obscenity of our culture the light will shine as we simply obey and love Christ.

Photos-
Bread Line - Dorothea Lange Collection, Oakland Museum of California
Macy's Department Store on Black Friday, CNN.COM

Ortega set to win Nicaraguan election on Pro/Anti-American platform.

Have you noticed that there are a growing number of international leaders that are gaining power based solely on their opposition to America (and possibly their uncool mustaches)?



The latest upset on the global scene is the predicted victory of Daniel Ortega and his return as the president of Nicaragua. In the 70's Ortega was the iron fisted "dictator" who ruled Nicaragua with the support of Cuba and the Soviet Union. The USA sponsored an insurgency (where have you heard that word used lately?) against the Sandanista Party that led to the fall of that government and the death of over 30,000 Nicaraguans.

Today Ortega has the support of Cuba and our newest "enemy" Venezuela. He has played a delicate balancing act as he has courted American investors while being less than friendly to American political leaders. I suppose he will also lead Nicaragua to join the non-alined group that is made of Iran, North Korea and other sordid nations.

Why are we making so many enemies of nations that were once our allies? Iran, Venezuela and Nicaragua were all allies at one point in recent history. "We" brought "freedom" to these nations so that they could elect anti-American leaders? What happened?

In short, American hypocrisy, prosperity and arrogance. We are PROUD to be Americans, as though it was our wisdom that gave birth to us. We consume the majority of the world's energy as we entertain ourselves to death. We tip our hats to God as we push the "American Way of Life" around the world in a vain effort to fulfill our manifest destiny of taking freedom to the four corners of the globe. We have supported "friendly" dictators while we have promoted democracy in nations that have hostile leaders. It has been a very short-sighted list of policies (on the part of both Democrats and Republicans) that had little to learn from history.

In the sixteen years since the fall of the communist Sandanista government, and the introduction to American style democracy life has not improved for the average Nicaraguan. Not surprisingly the wealthy minority Nicaraguans fear the return of Ortega, while most of the poverty stricken majority are apathetic. "At least we ate under the communist."

It is high time that we realize that democracy is not the answer to man's eternal questions. Democracy is not God's plan for man's salvation. Democracy can produce a high level of prosperity (when corruption is held at bay and the lower classes are provided for), but we must not forget that man's heart is wicked and over time man's free will will always led back to sin. Jesus did indeed come to set us free, but it is freedom from slavery to sin so that we can be SLAVES and friends of Christ. If we truly want to change the world I suggest that we extend our nation on behalf of the poor and outcast, and purchase friends for the lonely days ahead.

I don't think we have too much to worry about with a hand full of third world countries in opposition to the US of A. But, if we do not radically change our foreign policies and humble ourselves in the sight of the world we will surely see the numbers of radical anti-American leaders and nations growing.

Quote of the Weak -- Faith

"We are justified by faith alone, but the faith that justifies is never alone."

--John Calvin











"Therefore I take pleasure in infirmities, in reproaches, in needs, in persecutions, in distress, for Christ's sake. For when I am weak, then I am strong." (2 Corinthians 12:21)

John Calvin print from Art.com

All roads lead to evangelism???

"The purpose of the church is evangelism," the evangelist said. "If you are not evangelizing I seriously doubt your salvation. At the very least you are not a good Christian."



I have an eight year old daughter that cannot speak. I am convinced that she has faith in Christ, although I have never heard her say so. Most likely she will never say so. Yet, I see the love of Christ in her eyes, and I have witnessed her minister the grace of God to my family and others. I think she is the best Christian I know.

Saying that Jesus commanded all of His followers to be evangelists is as ridiculous as saying that He commanded all Christians everywhere to preach and teach. On the contrary, there are many instances where Jesus forbids his followers from "sharing the Gospel" with others and the apostle Paul warns that many should not become teachers.

I believe that God has prepared good works for His children to be involved in. I believe that each of His children have been uniquely gifted in order to edify the Church and bring glory to God. God is so gracious that He has enabled every believer to do what He has commanded. Above all else we are commanded to love, and even a mute paraplegic can lie on his back and love God.

I submit that a good Christian is one that follows Christ, and the purpose of the Church is to love God and our neighbor as ourselves. This is our eternal purpose as we display the manifold wisdom of God in heavenly places.

Do you really want to know that you are saved? Do you want to be sure that you are sure? Then I propose that you reject the magic of men, the sorcery of hearts and the manipulation of spirits. Away with the altar calls and the secret formulas! Forget the date and time. Disregard your experience, or lack thereof. To Hell with the spiritual abuse of children and the soul damning guilt that is heaped upon weak men and women!

Take comfort from the words of God, "Little children, let no one deceive you. He who practices righteousness is righteous...By this we know love, because He laid down His life for us. And we also ought to lay down our lives for the brethren. But whoever has this world's good, and sees his brother in need, and shuts up his heart from him, how does the love of God abide in him? My little children, let us not love in word or in tongue, but in deed and in truth. And by this we know that we are of truth, and shall assure our hearts before God." (I John 3:7, 16-19)

If you are a believer God has gifted you and given you His Holy Spirit. You have everything that is needed for godliness in Christ Jesus. Walk in those good works that He prepared for you before the creation of the Universe. Obedience to the commands of Christ is the evidence of faith. Cloth the naked, feed the hungry, bind up the broken hearted and care for widows and orphans. Be prepared to give an answer to those who question.

Do all roads lead to evangelism? I don't think so. But, all followers of Christ do lead to Christ as we exercise of individual gifts within the community of faith in deed and in truth.

John the Baptist -Print found at Art.com

The Sacrament of Penance

I had a discussion today with a pastor friend who had a question about forgiveness.

He had spoken to a Christian counselor about the topic of forgiveness. My friend is having to deal with former church members who have voiced a desire to reconcile.

"Saying, 'I'm sorry' is unBiblical," he said. I didn't know where he was going with this so I just listened. He went on to explain that saying that you are "sorry" is simply stating how you feel. "There is no forgiveness in simply stating facts," He said. " Something else is needed."

The evangelical Christian counselor went on to explain that confession of the wrong, asking for forgiveness and offering some sign of sincerity is the Biblical way to forgiveness.

Now, I must admit that I have had very little use for Christian counselors, but this guy is on to something that we as protestants have lost. Penance - the sign of sincerity. (Penance - a sacrament that includes contrition, confession, acceptance of punishment and absolution)

The protestant world sees "repentance" as necessary for forgiveness, and generally it is viewed among fundamentalists as an event that proceeds salvation. Some of the better protestant teachers make clear that repentance is a lifestyle of turning from sin and toward God (ie. changing your mind about sin and agreeing with God that it is bad). But, there is little to no mention of penance in the protestant circles.

Penance is often viewed by evangelicals as a means of "paying" for sin. This idea is rejected on good grounds as there simply is no way that we could "pay" for our sins. But, in the rejection of this extreme we have lost the Biblical role of confession in forgiveness. Just saying "I'm sorry" does not cut it, no matter how sincere you are.

A woman is caught in sin. She confesses her sins and asks for forgiveness. When Jesus offered forgiveness to the adulterous woman He gave her the penance of "...Go and sin no more." Always the call and command of Christ involves real and concrete actions. "Come, take up your cross and follow me."

As an example -- a young man goes to his elder and confesses his viewing of pornography on the internet. The elder brother prays for and comforts the young brother with the words of God. Then the elder brother prescribes the penance of putting a filter on the young brother's computer (or cutting off the internet altogether) in order to gage sincerity, but more importantly to help prevent the young man from repeating the same sin. Far from an "accountability partner" the young man has submitted to the authority of an elder and received an action to "prove" his repentance and aid the young man in sanctification. The young man now has the opportunity to walk in repentance and obey the command he has been given.

Listing my sins to God in some secret prayer and asking Him to forgive me is a cheap way of grace. Changing my mind about sin and telling God He is right is a nice idea that I suppose He appreciates. Paying for a candy bar I stole as a child makes me feel better.
However, actually confessing to someone who has authority over us, receiving God's word on the matter, performing in our bodies deeds of contrition and ceasing from the sins that plague us produce the grace of God in us in our quest for sanctification and the working out of our salvation. Confession, humility, action and obedience follow the disciples of Christ.

The Return of the prodigal Son by Rembrant van Rijn (Art.com)

Quote of the Weak -- Communion

"What we do in our bodies and in our physical, mundane lives does matter, both for sin and grace."


"Many Christians look for signs and miracles. But there is no more miraculous sign than what happens during Holy Communion. Many Christians look for religious experience, but there is no experience as vivid as tasting. Evangelicals talk about 'receiving Christ', something that happened way back at their conversion. But in the Lord's Supper, as we are brought back to the Gospel again and again, we can continue to receive Christ.
Contemporary Christianity tends to be all internalized - a matter of my feelings, my inner life and my personal opinions... the Reformers stressed how salvation is extra nos, outside ourselves, accomplished in the life, death, and resurrection of Christ.
Contemporary Christians tend to be all spiritual. They often scorn the physical realm... reasoning like Gnostics that what they do with their bodies does not affect their spirits. They often construe God as being in their heads, and they treat Jesus like some imaginary friend...
What we do in our bodies and in our physical, mundane lives does matter, both for sin and grace."

-- Gene Edward Veith

Quote of the Weak - The Great Commission

"Jesus told them to go and teach all nations. This was Jesus commanding before heaven and earth something of far greater significance than emphasizing evangelism. He is saying that the kingdom of God is open to the gentiles as well. Worship of God was no longer to be for the ceremonially clean chosen people of Israel, but for the whole world. So the Great Commission was a sweeping moment of revelation, not some emphasis on “beating the bushes” with tracts and door-to-door campaigns. We have missed the majesty of this passage if we assume it is merely about evangelistic efforts."

-- Chris Johnson (Saint Ambrose Blog)

"Therefore I take pleasure in infirmities, in reproaches, in needs, in persecutions, in distress, for Christ's sake. For when I am weak, then I am strong." (2 Corinthians 12:21)

What architecture says about your beliefs.

A student friend, that attends a local Baptist college, came into my office the other day in dismay over a lecture concerning the placement of the pulpit in many liturgical (or high) churches. The professor had noted the emphasis that was placed on the Eucharist (or Communion) during the Middle Ages and the removal of the pulpit to the side. The professor deduced that the placement of the pulpit to the side was an external sign of a belief that placed communion at the center of worship and preaching as subordinate or secondary to it.

Truly many sacramental denominations do refer to communion as the "most blessed" sacrament and believe that it is the focus or climax of true worship. The implication from the Baptist professor was that this emphasis was wrong, and that preaching should take the place as the center of true worship and the only means of grace being dispensed. Therefore the pulpit takes center stage in most protestant churches.

The issue that troubled my young friend was the ramifications of such an observation if it were applied to most Baptist churches today. To begin with the typical exterior of most Baptist churches is a plain brick rectangle with a steeple - this speaks of a practicality and modesty that is sadly disappearing. The sanctuary is situated much like a theatre with rows of pews facing a stage (I understand this is a practical and traditional way of building that is common to most churches) and communicates to the adherent a sense of observation rather than participation. The altar table (or Lord's Supper table) is generally in the lowest center of the stage in most Baptist churches. Often the altar table holds an arrangement of flowers (since it is only used for Communion four times per year) and the flowers resemble those one would place on a grave or memorial (which is very much in keeping with the Baptist view that Communion is ONLY a memorial and symbolic act of obedience). Above the table the heavy wooden pulpit is exalted which not only serves a practical purpose, but send a clear message of the importance of the sermon (the new plastic pulpits irritate me and I am not sure of the message they send). Interestingly enough the choir is raised above the pulpit, but it is located behind the pulpit which communicates the importance of "worship" (which means singing in most Baptist churches) and its secondary place of support of the sermon. On either side of the choir you will find an American flag and the "Christian flag" -- this conveys the syncretistic beliefs of many Baptists and the belief that God's kingdom IS of this world. However, the most highly exalted place in the typical Baptist sanctuary is the baptistry -- what are we to understand from this symbolic placement? Using the logic and observations of the Baptist professor we could deduce that baptism is the most important aspect of Baptist life and in essence is the "most blessed sacrament" for the non-sacramental Baptists.

I love the Orthodox and their view that the church building (and indeed the entire service of worship) should convey Heaven to Earth. Much of the art and architecture sends a message of God's holiness and the Gospel message. The crucifixion often takes center stage, the ceilings reach to the heavens, saints remind us of faithfulness and incense give the aroma of otherworldliness. There is a sense of antiquity and presence in most Orthodox churches. There can also be found an inordinate adoration of the saints and the Virgin Mary, but this, too, communicates to the adherent the reality of the communion (or fellowship) of saints.

In my book the Episcopal Church takes the prize for protestant architecture. They generally have the most beautiful, oldest and traditional buildings in town. They are saying that they are ancient, they are here to stay, and they are concerned with beauty. Furthermore, Episcopal bell towers usually have REAL bells in them (please do not even get me started on fiberglass steeples with PA systems that play fake bells)!



At Christ Community Church we have inherited a beautiful sanctuary with a typical seating arrangement of pews. Stained glass windows along the wall depict various aspects of Trinitarian belief without attempting to depict the persons of the Trinity. The windows are merely symbolic and no attempt is made to depict the body of Jesus and are therefore not to be considered graven images. We are not opposed to printed or painted images or depictions of Christ as many icons can be found on our printed materials, but you would be hard pressed to call a bulletin cover an idol. Care is taken to appeal to the sense of sight while at the same time not allowing the worshiper to fixate on an image, but rather on Christ Himself who transcends our creativity, imagination and comprehension.

There are two works of art on the wall that are passages of scripture written in a Celtic style. These passages are theme verses from past years that speak of knowing Christ and who we are in Him.

The altar table is centrally located on the floor and flanked by kneeling benches. A Bible is placed in the center of the table with bread and wine on either side of the Bible. Hopefully this communicates the importance that is placed on the written word of God and the physical body of Christ who is the Word of God.

A single goblet is filled with red grape juice and a platter holds a single loaf of unleavened bread. The single cup and loaf are symbolic of the unity we share in Christ. (However, we currently serve the juice in individual cups -- it is a practice that is practical and in consideration of germs since real wine is not being used. I do not wish to critique our practice at this time as we are in the thoughtful process of change.) Communion is taken in a kneeling position at the end of the service and in response to the sermon. Communion (or the Eucharist), then, is the "altar call" issued to believers to respond to the liturgy, scripture reading, singing and preaching of Christ. It is more than memorial or merely a symbol; it is a proclamation of our faith in Him.

Two candle stands hold a total of six candles that are lit at the beginning of each service. Two represents "witness." Three is the number of the "Trinity". Six is the number for "man". Jesus is the "Light of the world". He says that we are the "light." At CCC, we are human witnesses of the Trinity that show forth light to the world.

Our pulpit is a simple wooden podium that is moved to the center floor for preaching and removed after the sermon. The wooden podium is symbolic of the cross, and it conveys a heaviness that plastic cannot. It is movable for practical reasons, but its placement on the floor with the congregation conveys the idea that the Word of God came to dwell with us and is preached among the people.

As we occupy a former Methodist church we have no baptistry. Therefore, our baptisms must take place outside of the confines of our four walls. This forces us to take the proclamation of the Gospel to an outdoor facility such as a pool. Unwittingly, we have been placed in the position of proclaiming the death, burial and resurrection of Christ both inside and outside of the church building. We are a congregation that proclaims Christ in our regular sacred gathering places, as well as our secular community.

The musicians are placed on the raised floor that is behind the altar table and at the foot of a stained glass window that depicts the cross. On the cross hang a crown of thorns and a wreath of laurel (symbolic of the crown of glory Christ gained through His suffering). While the slight elevation difference of the platform (or stage) is due to previous design and the placement is practical for instruments, I think it does convey a slightly misleading message that we place a higher emphasis on music. At CCC I think it would be true to say that we value each element of the worship service equally. All of the service is to be Christ exalting, and conducted at the foot of the Cross to the glory of God.

Quote of the Weak -- Church Architecture

"Architects could design church spaces that encourage people to use more of their senses than just sight or hearing. Think of the possibilities if architects were to consider the five senses not in isolation from one another but in harmony with each other.
God gave us five senses for a reason. People need to look, to listen, to touch, to taste, and to smell when they are praising God. "

-- Leonard Sweet (Church Architecture for the 21st Century, Christianity Today 1999)

While I disagree with most of his article (too much emphasis on innovation and video screens) I very much like his thoughts concerning the harmony of senses in worship.

What did the Pope say?

The Pope's recent speech concerning peace and dialogue was the fuel for violence and threats from the Islamic world.

His words, a quote taken out of context, were an accusation that Mohammed taught growth by the sword and this teaching is wrong. Today the Pope said that this was not his view. Yet, the Muslim reaction around the world has served only to prove that Islam is a violent religion.

If you do read the Pope's speech it is a bit disturbing to see that the Pope seems to refers to the Koran in terms of scripture. If anything the Pope has been too benevolent by making Islam on the same plain as Christianity. Moderate Islamist have tried to calm their Fundamentalist brothers by pointing out that the Pope promotes Islam as one of the three great monotheistic religions, and that "thinking" Muslims are in some way in tune with God. Many say that the Pope is only speaking out against "radical" Islamist that have "hijacked Islam."

The belief in the equality of belief (at least as far as the "monotheistic" religions) is popular among many Christians these days, but you will find it is rare in the Islamic world.

One point that the Pope was trying to make is that you cannot force religion on anyone. Sure the Catholic Church has been guilty of trying, and various Christians throughout the history of the Church have tried coercions in many forms. But, listen to what the man is saying! He does not believe in forcing religion on people - either the Christian or Muslim religion.

All religions are not equal. To say that "Mohammed promoted peace" is about as smart as saying that "Jesus promoted violence".

Jews do not believe that God is triune. Muslims do not believe that God is triune. More than philosophy Christianity stands out above the other "monotheistic" religions pointing to Jesus as the Way, the Truth and the Life -- the only way to get to the Father. Christianity is not only monotheistic, but it is Trinitarian.

While I do not think that the Pope is God's voice on Earth it does trouble me to hear him apologize for the reaction that misinformed zealots (which seem to be the majority) had concerning his quote. Pope Benedict, please do not make apologies. Preach the Gospel, repentance and faith, and Christ as the only way!

Quote of the Weak -- Compassion

"I want to send the signal to our enemy that you have aroused a compassionate and decent and mighty nation, and we're going to hunt you down."
-- President George W. Bush

"Therefore I take pleasure in infirmities, in reproaches, in needs, in persecutions, in distress, for Christ's sake. For when I am weak, then I am strong." (2 Corinthians 12:21)

He is Holy, He is Love

Thursday night I despaired of life. Lauren was suffering. She had injured her deformed legs in therapy. Her seizures were too many to count. She vomited her supper onto her pillow.

My eldest daughter was frustrated as she was helpless to stop the suffering. "I know life is not fair, but this isn't right." As my wife and daughter cried over Lauren she said clearly, "Anna. No." and wiped the tears from Anna's face.

I went to the bathroom and screamed my prayers of frustration into a rolled up towel.

Did God count those tears?

There are many things we can know about God. Two specific things that scripture reveals about God's nature are that He is holy, holy, holy and He is love.

Because He is holy, He cannot sin and does no evil. Because He is perfectly holy, there is none like Him. Because He is holy, He must also be just. Because He is holy, evil will not prevail forever. Because He is holy, He is glorified. Because He is holy, He is to be feared.

Because God is love, he must love. Because God is love, He is full of mercy. Because God so loved the world, He gave us His only begotten Son Jesus.

I am persuaded today that it is God's nature of love and holiness that motivate His actions toward us. While He may have every right to glorify Himself, He does it in such a way that it is both holy and full of love.

The world was made for Jesus. The world was made by Jesus. He was supreme in glory before the foundations of the universe, and His love was perfect before the world was formed. Yet, God created the universe so that His love would be manifest and His glory displayed. Christ's Bride was created by God for Him that He might have an object of His love. Such great love is amazing. I am not saying that He created the universe for man, nor am I saying that man is the center of the universe. But our God is so great that He created man to love, and the universe as the setting for this divine and glorious love affair.

It is because of His great love that we who believe have been chosen, and given faith, hope and love. It is because of His great love that we are destined to be conformed to His image and share in His glory. It is because of His great love that all things work together for the good of them that love God and are called according to His purposes. It is because of His great love that we are being conformed through sharing in His suffering to the image of His Son Jesus.

The world is not fair and it certainly is not right. Indeed, all of creation groans under sin. But I am convinced today that God is love and He is holy, holy, holy. I believe, although I die, I will see my daughter walk and proclaim with all of creation that Jesus is LORD to the glory of God the Father. I have faith that by His great love I will see my Redeemer and Lauren will stand with Him on that day. "We will dance on streets that are golden; the glorious Bride and the great Son of Man. Every tribe and every nation will join in the song of the Lamb!"

Because of His Holy Love, He counts every tear, and they will be redeemed for joy!

Why some hate the Reformation Movement

What, you don't know?

There is a "movement" among Baptists these days. I think the word movement should indicate that there is a potential error afoot. Most movements seem to unintentionally breed cultish behavior by focusing too much on a particular teaching or passage. Even what may be called "good movements" such as the Great Awakening promoted a pendulum swing in the other direction. Jehovah's Witnesses, Mormons and every other Christian cult that I know of was the result of or a reaction to a "movement."

You will notice that I have avoided the word "revival." Revival carries with it too much baggage and the picture of a mad man in a three piece suit pounding a pulpit. Revival also implies a connection with our emotions. So, I believe most people prefer to call what is happening a movement. However, this term is not without its connotations as well.

The charismatic movement has birthed a great number of heretics as the emphasis has been on emotions, feelings, prophesy, manifestations and revelation. Not all charismatics are heretics, mind you. This movement affected Baptists in that many churches shifted to a more emotional worship style and preaching that was pointed at the perceived needs of the congregation (salvation and personal happiness) which is now termed "man-centered preaching." Evangelism focused less on the work of God and more on the "decision" of the man.

Today there is a growing minority among Baptists that are reacting to the emphasis on emotion by appealing to reformation theology. Reformation theology being the theology that resulted (or was recovered) in the reformation movements of the 1500s in Europe. Luther, Calvin and many others had restored the doctrines of the Church Fathers, and they focused heavily on the doctrines of grace, election, predestination and salvation. Today's reformist would claim that they are seeking "God-centered preaching."

Luther was a monk that never felt saved. He tried with all his might to be saved and it was not until he understood that the "just shall live by faith" that he was freed from the bondage of a works-based salvation. He was free indeed. His was not a passionless salvation, but rather one that was worked out in fear and trembling.

Calvin seems to have been much more intellectual and scholarly in his approach (Not that Luther was a dope, he did translate the entire Bible into German. He was just more "earthy.") Both men gloried in the doctrines of grace concerning salvation and the fact that God is the one who elects to save according to His will. It is God who gives faith and God who has predestined those who receive faith to be conformed to the image of Christ.

While many may think that it is election or predestination that causes fellow believers to hate the Reformation Movement, I would submit that it is neither. I have come to the conclusion that the movement is hated because it is imbalanced.

When I first read the passages (in a college Bible study) in Romans that concern God's election, I was offended. I had grown up with an imblanced view that I had saved myself. "I was sinking deep in sin far from the peaceful shore..." But, if the Apostle Paul was right I was not sinking -- I was "DEAD in sins and trespasses." I was not seeking God, but He was seeking me. The offense was replaced with joy and a sureness that I had never known concerning my own salvation. It was not my work, rather it was the work of God. It was not MY faith, nor my sincere prayer that saved me. It was faith that God gave me regardless of my emotion, sincerity or manifestations.

My zeal for good theology sent me gorging on words about God. The more I knew the more proud and arrogant I became. I began to hate the Church in America. I came to see most churches in America as fulfillments of the prophesy concerning Laodacea (although they were rich and had need of nothing they were poor, blind, miserable and naked). I gloried in the wrath of God that was being stored up for the sons of disobedience. I gloried that I was chosen before the foundations of the World. I hated the ignorant preachers who spent more time beating me up for not tithing or being a good person than speaking about Christ.

I was becoming full of good theology. I was so full that I could not eat another bite. The sweetness of God's love had become repulsive to me as I had feasted on His glory, wrath and election. Some years later, God brought me to a point of starvation.

The day that I was told that my daughter had brain damage all of my good theology flew right out the window. "God is without body, parts or passions." "God does everything for His own glory." Extra Biblical theological statements and maxims were useless to me. All I knew was the Gospel, and I wanted God to speak to me. I cried and moaned for hours. Quote Calvin to me, are you kidding me? God had deformed my child for His own egocentric glory?!? I didn't want to hear Calvin, Luther or Billy Graham for that matter. I had to hear from God Himself. I was not hungry; I was famished.

"Do you hate your daughter?"

"No, God. Maybe I am angry with you, but how could I hate her?"

"Then why do you hate my Church? You say you love me, but you hate my Bride. Therefore, my love does not live in you."

That word was so bitter, but God's bitter word was sweet to a starving man.

Scripture does not teach us that God so desired to glorify Himself that He sent Jesus. On the contrary His word teaches us that "God so LOVED the world that He gave His only begotten Son." God's nature is love. He is LOVE. Of course His love brings Him glory; everything He does is glorious. But God is a God of passion and love. This passionate God loved us so much that He took on flesh, humbled Himself and became a man. He disrobed His glory and manifest His very nature of Love by submitting to death on a cross. His love and power resurrected the dead body of Christ, and it is by His love that He gives faith and His Spirit to men, and conforms them to His image. It is because of His great love that He has done this. It is because of His great love that He has maimed my daughter's body and afflicted us with trials. He is working all things together for the good of them that love Him and are called according to His good purposes.

I fear God. I mean shaking in my shoes terrified. I fear Him because of His great love. He is the Lion of Judah that tears us to pieces. He is also the Lamb of God that loves us with a jealous and divine passion. He loves us so much that we share in the sufferings of Christ so that we might be more than converted -- we might be made new creatures and conformed to His glorious image.

We have been commanded to make disciples. We have been commanded to teach and reprove. But the greatest commandment is to love God and our neighbor as ourselves. If love is our motivation (as I believe it is God's), then everything that we do will be to the glory of God.

Why do some people hate the reformation movement? While it is full of zeal for good theology, it is often void of God's love, the love He has for Christ's body (His bride, the Church) and His passion that is all consuming.

Tolerance and the question of the Universe

I read a new blog recently that was written by a sincere Pakistani who was vainly promoting tolerance. He (or she) will soon find out how intolerant religious people are.

I do take issue with the idea that the center of Semitic religions is tolerance. The center of Islam, Judaism and Christianity should be God. Each religion has its own particular view of a monotheistic god and each religion's practice is determined by that view of a god. Quite simply none of these religions is based upon tolerance.

I cannot speak for Islam or Judaism, but I can speak as a Christian. Love of God and love for man is the greatest commandment, but that does not mean that I should condone all of mans' beliefs or behaviors.

Rather than teaching tolerance or ambivalence Christ taught that we should live in a way that brings light to a dark world and stands in stark contrast to other systems of belief and practice. While we are not to condemn others we are certainly not commanded to condone others.

In this nation (USA) tolerance carries with it the idea that anyone's belief is not above another's. Tolerance has come to mean submission. Nothing is absolute, nothing is true -- therefore, no one should have the the belief that his faith is true so as to disrespect others beliefs. This is a silly idea. If a man believes perfectly that the moon is made of cheese his belief is wrong. It is not my place to change his belief through argument or violence, but I certainly do not have to live by his belief, nor should I have to submit to it. To respect such a belief and place it as equal to truth would be ridiculous.

I (neither would the Pakistani blogger) respect the beliefs of anyone who is willing to kill others so as to force his/her beliefs on someone else.

Talk of tolerance is a diversion from the real issue.

The main question of the Universe is Who is God?

Islam says that Allah is God and there is no other.

Judaism says that Jehovah is God and there is no other.

Christ says, "I am the way, the truth and the life and there are none that come to the Father except by me."

These three teachings (Islam, Judaism and Christianity) are tri-polar opposites and cannot all be true.

In the blog a sincere peace-loving Muslim's question read, "How can someone who is truly religious kill themselves?" I do not understand the zealots who kill others, nor do I understand how they think this will persuade others to follow their example or their god. However, Christians are called to "kill themselves" in a sense.

We have been commanded to put to death the deeds of the flesh, which are murder, envy, strife, lust, etc. I submit that the man who truly knows God must "kill himself" and love all of man kind. Far from simple tolerance Christians have been commanded to active self-sacrificial love. Tolerance is inactive, I can sit on a log and tolerate everyone. Love is active, I must pursue love in deed and truth.

The blogger went on to say that all true religions promote tolerance as tolerance is the center of true religion. While I appreciated this Mulsim's hope for promoting peace and tolerance I think his assessment is superficial at best. I do not claim to understand Islam, however I would never say that the essence of Islam or religion is "tolerance."

The essence of religion should be answering the questions; Who is God? What did He say? How should I then live?

Listerine Kills!

Today flights were canceled, people around the world were having their hygiene products confiscated, arrest were made and a group of young English Muslims of Pakistani decent gave new meaning to the ad slogan, "Listerine Kills..."








Thanks to a moronic group of Islamic "fascists" (as W put it) seems that toothpaste, shampoo and that loved/hated mouthwash are now contraband on flights.

First the guy who tried to light his shoes, now mouthwash. Is nothing sacred?!?

The irony is that these punks were trying to terrorize the Capitalist West and bring our economic engines to a screeching halt. What they did was cause the stock prices for hygiene products to gain ground and sent hundreds of thousands of would-be squeaky clean travelers to Wal-Mart to replace their shampoo that was impounded by the TSA. Most travelers were mildly irritated, but travel again they will.

Maybe instead of banning my toothpaste our government should reconsider decades of flawed policies directed at most of the world's poorest populations. When will we get it through our heads that it is not OUR freedom that the Islamic world fears (it is our freedom that makes us vulnerable to their shoe and Listerine bombers) it is THEIR freedom that they fear. Freedom is a mixed bag of good and bad. They do not want our democratic system of government, nor do they want the decadence that accompanies it. They do not want their women to be treated like human beings. Most of all they want us to stop supporting everything that Israel (the most democratic society in the Middle East) does just because they are democratic (and that shared religious heritage Judao/Christian stuff).

I am afraid that the more the Muslim extremists try to terrorize the West the more the West will infringe upon the East. Ironically these young zealots are going to bring to their nations the thing they fear most -- more US troops to the Middle East and more Americans to the support of Israel's "fight against terrorists." Did these cave dwellers not see how many American flags were flying on the day after September 11? Terrorism does affect Americans deeply, and makes us even more resolved.

I have to admit that I have been swayed today. The more attacks we face as a nation the more patriotic I feel. The more I am hated for simply being born in America the more American I feel. I was against the war, I'm still against war. I think democracy is not such a good idea on a global scale. But, the more Muslims try to kill Westerners (and fellow Muslims as in Iraq) the more empathy I feel toward Israel and England. Sure America has done a lot of bad things in the name of democracy. Truly Israel has taken land that did not legally belong to them. Of course Great Britain made gross errors in dividing up the Middle East (which was a mess before the UK got involved). But, what makes Osama think that by terrorizing the general public of free nations we will want to run headlong back into the dark ages? For better or worse a free society may not be able to freshen up on a flight, but we refuse to ban Muslims from flights. We will not become the racist bigots and zealots that threaten us.

My message to the terrorists -- Keep it up and I'll be working for the right of Muslim women everywhere to vote. What woman would "mastermind" a plan to kill thousands of innocent people?

Thanks a lot, zealots, for taking my toothpaste away on my next international flight. May the bad breath of a hundred thousand travelers fill the nostrils of your sleep.

We will empower no leaders before their time.

Why is it that we never hear of a Christian church or school that has as its motto, "Training the Followers of Tomorrow!" Where are all the followers going to come from for all the leaders we are training?

Jesus never said, "Follow me and I will make you leaders of men." His command was to "follow me" and the promise was that He would make the followers to be "fishers of men." Furthermore, in the Church the leaders are called "apostles," "shepherds," "elders" and "overseers" instead of "lords," "bosses" and "tyrants." Authority is vastly different than our concept of leadership. To be an authority in the Church is to be a "servant to all." The authorities in the Church are commanded to watch over, love, care for, teach, reprove and instruct. The only instruction that seems to indicate leadership is by example and lifestyle.

Spiritual authority is voluntarily exercised and voluntarily received. We have spiritual authorities for our good and our protection. When our authorities fail, we suffer; when we fail to follow, we suffer.

What is seen as a "silly rule" or "stupid paperwork" is actually a blessing from God. The fact that the IRS has authority over me to make me report the expenses of the ministry makes me a better bookkeeper and hopefully, a better spender of the funds entrusted to me.

As a young Christian I was zealous and put into leadership as a teenager. I entered college with a plan to continue being the leader and continued to be a minister on church staff. It took me a decade to have the pride beaten out of me that was the result of too much authority too fast. There are few realms in the world where a young inexperienced man, whose philosophy has not been proven, can become the leader. Can you imagine graduating college and immediately becoming the president of a bank? I don't care how much "knowledge" you have, you have not proven it. You have not "earned" it. And you have not gained the experience that transforms knowledge into wisdom.

I have been guilty of promoting younger brothers to positions of power (all be it small) before their time. This can lead to pride and actually harm my brother that I am trying to help. Walton says, "help is from Hell." What we need is a radical (paradigm if you will) shift in our thinking. We are not "helped" by God; we are saved by God. What He has done is a radical new creation. He has turned the world upside down and established the things that were not. We were DEAD in an ocean of sin (not swimming just fine, thank you very much).

There is a strong temptation in the missions world to send as many young Christians overseas as we can possibly facilitate. Why do we continue to think that God thinks the way we think? Why do we think that God has such a sense of urgency that He would negate His own Word (not to put a novice in authority, lest he become conceited and fall into the snare of the devil) and lead us to put a novice in authority? If Jesus Christ Himself was not ready for public ministry until He was about 30, then who are we to think that we are ready at 21?

Like a fine wine that is perfected through patience, we should empower no leaders before their time.

Quote of the Weak -- Apocalypse

"America has to support Israel. You know what they say, 'You shouldn't change horses in mid-apocalypse.'"
-- Arlene (my sister who blogs vicariously)

Quote of the Weak -- Emotions

"If I wasn't on anti-depressants, I might have teared up a little."
-- Ben Williams in response to Iz's rendition of Somewhere Over the Rainbow.

"Therefore I take pleasure in infirmities, in reproaches, in needs, in persecutions, in distress, for Christ's sake. For when I am weak, then I am strong." (2 Corinthians 12:21)

Violent ambivalence

I admire Brian's blog. Generally it is lighthearted and makes me laugh. When he does have something profound to communicate, he does it in such a way that he offends no one. Brian cares deeply about some issues; if you look closely at his blog you can discern what they are. He does this in such a way that he leaves the reader to come to his own conclusions. Brian actually survives quite well in the world, and he has achieved a balance that I often envy. Brian is profoundly innocuous and he stirs people to deeper thought and action all the time, allowing them to feel that it was their idea all along.

I am what you may call "opinionated;" most people call it "obnoxious." Everyone has an opinion on just about every subject, even if their opinion is simply, "I don't care." But there are a few of us out there that are passionately opinionated. Amongst the passionately opinionated, there is a minority that are also conflicted in their opinions. Seems that I have such strong feelings on so many subjects and many times my strong feelings are conflicting. I am what is called V.A. = violently ambivalent.

V.A. can manifest itself in many ways, but generally involves the phrase, "I don't care." For example, "I don't care where we eat! Anywhere but ethnic, or fish, or burgers, or chicken; I don't care! Just pick somewhere!!!" In this situation the simple fact is I must eat and I do care where I don't eat, but I do not know where I want to eat. The longer it takes to make a decision, the more VA I can get.

Most of the time I don't know what the answers are. I may know what the problem is, but I don't know how to fix it. The result more often than not is a provocative display of VA. Why do I care about wars in the Middle East? Why do I care about Christians on TV who resemble clownish snake oil salesmen and make us all look goofy? Why do I care about man-centered mission strategies? What do I plan to do about it? I don't know, just so long as I don't have to go to battle with a missiologist in a pink wig.